To critique the site as Kant would, I decided to dive in and pretend to be a user (since for him beauty is in the eye of the beholder), and see what beauty I could find in the site and its services. I went through the site again, and explored some of their pages and articles. They have a lot of interesting material, and I found myself reading multiple articles without intending to. A large reason I read those articles was because they were right there on the top of the front page, with gripping titles. I did find myself wondering which tabs to select--the ones on the top or the ones on the side, since I could tell that some of them were the same but not all. So that was confusing and definitely not a design that I could appreciate or find value in as a user. I also found the order of the drop down menus somewhat illogical. I wonder if there is a way for the site creators to track which tabs are clicked on most and have those be at the top of the drop down menus.
Previous: Hume on lds.net
Next: Hegel on lds.net
Back to Report Card
No comments:
Post a Comment